How
does each of the following impact historical thinking: continuity and change,
causality, and context? Why is writing history considered a craft? What skills
are necessary to be a good historian?
Historical thinking is
using different reasoning skills to understand, analyze, and ask questions
about historical subjects. It allows historians to more accurately comprehend a
subject. Continuity, change, causality, and context are all important ideas when
historically thinking about a topic.
Continuity and change
are complementary concepts; they both work at the same speed within the same
timeline. As our textbook states, “Most changes take place in the overall
context of continuance of many of the old ways of doing things, and they are
often no more than patchwork alterations of the existing system.”[1] Continuity
is the constant; change is the irregular. Continuity allows historians to draw
comparisons from the past to the present. We can also see what has remained the
same over time. Change is a tool used to categorize eras, show turning points,
and some would argue that history is the study of change in its entirety.
Causality is by
definition the connection between cause and effect. This concept is an integral
part of historical thinking. How will one event affect another? If one thing
happens, what happens because of it? Although no one can predict the future,
being able to draw from the past (Continuity) allows historians to predict,
within reason, future events. For example: taxes, food shortage, social class
inequality are all causes, what will they affect? What have they affected in
the past?
Context is a very
important idea for proper historians to execute. Context is how an excerpt of
an event, statement, situation, or idea fits into the bigger picture. Many
people take things out of context to fit their own means, it is a historians
job the take an excerpt if it is given and think critically about it before
presuming anything. For example: I recently read a quote from Abraham Lincoln
somewhere that made him look like a racist. That quote was most likely taken
out of context, and it was my job as a historian to think about the reasons to
why it was taken out of context. Who was he talking to? When did he say it?
What are the reasons he could have said it?
Historically thinking
about a subject is a skill that needs to be practiced. Engineers pick apart
mechanical things to see how and why they work. A historian’s job is to pick
apart history and figure out how and why it happened.
A craft is something
that is learned, something that needs to be practiced and honed; it is a skill.
Writing history takes time and effort to succeed; it needs to be practiced and cultivated.
There are a lot of skills historians need to succeed in the field, being a good
writer is one of the most important. You also need to be a detective, that is,
you need to be able to investigate and research history. You need to be able to
think critically about subjects and be able to analyze, understand, and
interpret different topics. You need to have a thirst for knowledge and also be
able to communicate and work with other historians.
Work Cited:
Furay,
Conal, and Michael J. Salevouris. The Methods and Skills of History. 3rd ed. Wheeling,
IL: Harlan Davidson, Inc., 2010.
[1] Conal
Furay and Michael J. Salevouris, The Methods and Skills of History, 3rd ed.
(Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson, Inc., 2010), 26.