Monday, June 18, 2012

Strengths and weaknesses of the French Military Forces and the Vietminh Military Forces Between 1946 and 1954


Strengths and weaknesses of the French Military Forces and the Vietminh Military Forces Between 1946 and 1954
            During the time of the first French Indochina War between the years of 1946 and 1954 the conflicting forces (the French and the Vietminh) displayed both strengths and weaknesses. In this essay I will discuss some of those strengths and weaknesses and how they eventually led to the Wars conclusion.
            The French had control over Vietnam for almost seventy years before conflicts started in the early 1940’s. After the Japanese surrendered in WWII they were forced to leave Indochina and France once again saw an opportunity to take back what they thought was rightfully theirs. After peace talks fell through multiple times because France would settle for no less than total control over the area, the first French Indochina war began. In the early months of the war on November 23rd 1946 the French gave Vietnamese citizens only two hours to evacuate the area of Haiphong before they leveled the city. In the aftermath of the attack 6,000 citizens were dead and over 25,000 were wounded.1 France would stop at nothing to reclaim this territory for their own. Unfortunately, this ambition was one of their greatest weaknesses. The French dream of taking back Vietnam cost 89,000 French lives; and for what? In the end they lost not only Vietnam but the rest of their French colonies would begin to fall like dominoes. At the beginning of the war before Vietnam acquired powerful allies, France was superior in numbers and equipment. The Vietminh could field about 150,000 troops when the war began; the numbers consisted of a few trained military men but was mostly filled out by peasants and youth. At the same time, France could field over 150,000 trained soldiers.2 The Vietminh didn’t fight out in the open with direct attacks against the French, they used guerrilla warfare tactics. This meant that all of the French army equipped with the best weapons they could get was of little consequence to the “duck and roll” tactics employed by the Vietminh.
            The Vietminh were the underdogs for a large portion of the war until the early 1950’s when China and the Soviet Union came to their aid. The important strengths to note about the Vietminh were their determination, patience, and resourcefulness. Without these three qualities, they wouldn’t have lasted long enough for aid to get to them in the 1950’s. Their use of guerrilla warfare tactics provided a hit and run war where the French couldn’t really get a good look at their enemy. Once China and the Soviet Union had provided military assistance, in my opinion, the war was already over. The victory for the Vietnam at the Battle of Dien Bien Phu was considered the decisive battle of the war.3 This time the tables were turned; the Vietminh had over 250,000 troops, workers, technicians, mechanics, advisers, etc. against a French force of 12,000 men.4 Another important thing to note about the Vietminh forces is that they were willing to sacrifice as many men as they needed too. An estimated 500,000 Vietminh were killed as opposed to an estimated 89,000 French Union Forces.5 The country had nothing to lose and everything to gain from this war. Their independence was the goal, and through the three qualities I mentioned before, plus a little help from neighboring countries they were able to obtain that goal.
            Both countries displayed both strengths and weaknesses during the first French Indochina War. Unfortunately for France, their impossible goal never seems quite in reach. The determination to achieve independence was the Vietminh’s most important strength as it carried them through the early years of the war. Overall, the Vietminh wanted victory more than the French were willing to fight for theirs.

What Should the US have learned from the French Defeat in the First Vietnam War?




What SHOULD the United States Have Learned?
            There are a few important things that the United States should have learned politically and militarily from the French loss to the Vietminh in the first Vietnam War from 1946 to 1954.
            Let us start with what historians call the decisive battle of the war.1 Dien Bien Phu was said to have been lost by the French within the first two days of the battle.2 This particular battle was fought in early 1954 when the Vietminh began receiving military assistance from both China and the Soviet Union. Going into the battle the Vietminh hopelessly outnumbered the 12,000 French soldiers with 50,000 main troops, another 50,000 support forces, 200,000 workers, an estimated 25,000 Chinese workers, not to mention the trucks, artillery, supplies, food, ammunition, etc. that had been supplied by all three constituents.3 This is clue one for the United States: Vietnam had powerful allies in which they could obtain military assistance. Moss mentions something that still resonates with me, “General Navarre’s two fatal strategic errors were his underestimation of Vietminh capabilities—and his over estimation of French capabilities during the impending showdown battle.”4 This is clue two for the United States: Do NOT underestimate the enemy and do NOT overestimate yourself. With the Geneva Conference marked for May of 1954, General Giap wanted to make this battle a statement. He wanted to completely crush the French at Dien Bien Phu so that when they went to the conference that would have much better leverage on the table.5 Clue three for the United States: The Vietminh were skilled at political maneuvers. They knew how to manipulate certain political situations to achieve their goals. During this battle it was not only life or death for the Vietminh, but for their country as well. They fought like champions securing point after point until the French had nowhere to run. When one door closed, they did not just open another one, they made their own. Clue four for the United States:  The Vietminh were skilled at military maneuvers and were able to adapt and change plans at the drop of a hat.  The Vietminh were smart. Lastly, I would like to talk about casualties for the battle of Dien Bien Phu. French soldiers went away with 7,500 dead or wounded and the Vietminh sustained an estimated 23,000 casualties.6 The Vietminh were willing to literally throw as many men as necessary at the job to get it done with a result in their favor. THIS is clue five for the United States: You are fighting a bloodthirsty enemy with nothing to lose and everything to gain, Beware.
            Dien Bien Phu really offers a small scale insight to the whole of the first Vietnam War. Above we have five clues that the United States should have picked up on for the future Vietnam War. There is one other important thing to mention when it comes to what the US should have learned from the French defeat at Vietnam. Clue six for the United States: There is a reason public opinion for the war went down in France to an almost nonexistent level. Common sense would dictate that there might be a reason people have a low public opinion of those specific War reasons and that opinion might not be contained solely in France. Another thing that plays into this clue is that during this time the media was ready and roaring to go. With the readily available wartime information from journalists, stories, pictures, and more the people at home got primary and secondary accounts of the brutal battles that were going on overseas. In early wars like the American Revolution, the War of 1812, and the Civil War you did not get the full story 100% of the time, and you  did not  get the full coverage like you do now. This is an important factor for public opinion of a war.
            Now is a good time to mention some of Americas other faults when it came to thoughts going into the second Vietnam War. America had this picture of what it wanted for Vietnam even though we had NO real stakes in the matter. We sided with France, who lost, so that is the end right? Wrong. We were bigger, stronger, more technically savvy, and smarter than the French. We had more drive, determination, and a better military prowess than the French, or so LBJ thought.7 We were going into this war to finish what the French had started, but instead of expanding our empire, we wanted to stop the spread of communism (or at least, that is what FDR said). The Vietminh strategy had not changed one bit from the previous Vietnam War, they planned on using patience, guerrilla warfare, and political tactics that wore down the enemy and undermined their will to fight. 8 These points will also play a crucial part in the second Vietnam War.
            There are a few main things the United States should have learned from the French loss in the First Vietnam War. Firstly, Vietnam had powerful allies. Secondly, the French underestimated the Vietminh and overestimated themselves; a problem the United States also struggled with. Thirdly, The Vietminh were skilled in political maneuvers. Fourthly, the Vietminh were skilled in military maneuvers with an out of the box thinking. Fifthly, the Vietminh were willing to sacrifice whatever it took to win their independence (A feeling the United States should be familiar with). Lastly, Public opinion plays a crucial part in modern day wars. In my opinion the United States did not pay close enough head to the mistakes of the French, so justly, they were doomed to repeat them. 

Monday, June 4, 2012

Newburgh Conspiracy Project

























Internship

Interning at the museum has been such a cool experience. Right now we are working to catalog all items in the archives. Everyday you can come across a new item with its own story. We are starting with toys and so far the  oldest toy i have seen is from the mid 1800's. We also have a huge collection of dolls that range from the 1800's up. More stories coming soon!